Some Candid thoughts about life, and foreclosure defense…….
About Standing for Something – Or Falling for Anything!
Many people have asked me, how do you do it? Why do you fight for people facing foreclosure?
The cynic says “you are just a rotten lawyer that does everything for money.”
Really? I had an easy retainer tonight. Homeowner facing eviction, looking for hope and some issues worth looking into.
Well, I thoroughly examined the loan file, chain of title, and facts of the case, and at the end of the day, there were no legal challenges to be made.
I informed the client of such, and the client cried her heart out to me on the phone. Is this a easy message to deliver, or easy response to take?
I don’t think so. It hurts.
But I have to be honest. A legal challenge would amount to nothing more than throwing good money after bad.
In fact, I had two of these cases this week alone. It hurts, but at least the homeowners know they investigated their legal rights, and there were none to assert.
For some people, this brings peace of mind and closure.
Some people want to see what rights they have, if any.
On another vein, I also emailed back and forth with another attorney tonight who also practices in the area of foreclosure defense and bankruptcy law.
She asked me how it is I maintain the fight in two states (California and Arizona) who are creditor/bank friendly. She sent me a link as to how Arizona was backing down on their SB 1259 law that sought to force the banks to prove their chain of title before foreclosing. Of course we all know by now the banks have no ability to show a legal right to foreclose with a full endorsed note from the loan originator to the securitized loan trustee that claims to own the loan. Just pure legal fiction. But what can we do?
This attorney had just got done settling a foreclosure case on her end (Kudos – and she is proud of it rightfully so) and yet the settlement agreement
(as always) says the attorney must keep HUSH HUSH on the settlement. Should anyone really be surprised? If a homeowner is SO LUCKY to win their case, this MUST be KEPT A SECRET. The Banks do not want everyone to know HOW they won, what the cases were, or what the problem on their end was. Believe me, if there was no problem, they would not settle. Right?
Anyway, here is what I emailed to her:
I fight so I can truly live…..Just fought a judge 7 days in Paso Robles and finally got the TRO.
The truth is in the trenches….of each business…..behind the scenes…..unreported, just like your settlement.
Your truth is too big for prime time news. Would unsettle the waters.
Welcome to America.
At the end of the day, as one of my broker clients told me a few years back “YOU HAVE TO STAND FOR SOMETHING OR YOU WILL FALL FOR ANYTHING.”
I AM NOT WILLING TO FALL FOR THE FORECLOSURE NONSENSE I SEE ON A DAILY BASIS.
PEACE OUT.
STEVE VONDRAN, ESQ.
ARIZONA AND CALIFORNIA
FORECLOSURE AND BANKRUPTCY LAWYER
Banks and Servicers agree to Consent Order – Wrongful Foreclosure will be compensated. But who gets money and how much?
In what appears to be another act of federal window dressing to put Americans and foreign investors at ease that our financial system is the best in the world and worthy of your investment dollars, the Federal Regulators (OTS, OCC, and FRB) have concluded their investigation into foreclosure practices of the major banks and loan servicers and have come up with a settlement order that is supposed to make us all feel good.
The details on the consent order of the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) can be found here.
The basics of the settlement orders (which include banks such as Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, US Bank, One West, Aurora, ALL Y Financial (formerly GMAC), and yes, our good friend MERS (the software company) are as follows:
(1) The banks and servicers neither admit nor deny any liability (hmmm, that’s a good start – I wish DRE audits could end up that way)
(2) The banks are supposed to set up an independent consulting firm to review their individual practices and come up with a compliance game plan in 60 days (hmm, since they have sworn up and donw in court and elsewhere that they have done nothing wrong, not sure what their game plan will consist of)
(3) The game plan is supposed to address certain “unsafe and unsound acts” and “deficiencies” (I guess we can’t call it fraud – that is a bad word) such as:
- False assignments of Deeds of Trust and transfer of other mortgage documents
- False affidavits to Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Courts
- Fix the robosigner problem
- Better oversight of outsourced serviced providers and third party law firms who have assisted in foreclosure-gate
- Improper notarization of records that have been submitted to courts and the county recorder’s offices across the country
- Etc. etc.
Sounds great, but these banks and financial institutions have always claimed to be 100% clean, and have blamed borrowers and their attorneys for everything. We will have to wait and see what their independent investigations reveal and what their self-imposed compliance plan will detail.
Question: What about dealing with RESPA and TILA rights. Banks / Servicers could give a c*** about that either, at least generally speaking.
Also, there is supposed to be a compensation, remediation, and reimbursement for “wrongful foreclosures” committed between 2009-2010 (but no third party beneficiaries of the settlement agreement are allowed). There are no guidelines as to who qualifies, what the standards or criteria is, or what amounts will be paid.
There is also no mention of any private right of action – and third party beneficiary status under these agreements is negated. Just a bunch of self-enforcement back slapping and compliance window-dressing???
The 50-state state attorney generals, treasury, FTC, Justice department and CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU (created by the Dood-Frank Act) are also continuing there investigations, and we will see what that brings.
Taking this with the 50-States Mortgage Mess Settlement agreement with the state Attorney general’s (See mortgage mess settlement agreement) – which was another measure seeking to bring some fairness into this mess of a foreclosure system – shows the extent of the foreclosure problem in America. The banks, who gave risky loans to virtually anyone with a heartbeat (no document loans, false appraisals, negam loans, option arm loans, stated income loans, etc.) need to step up to the plate and honestly fix this system and compensate people who have been wrongfully foreclosed.
IF YOU WANT TO HEAR OUR FORECLOSURE MELTDOWN FORECLOSURE RADIO SHOW ON THIS TOPIC CLICK HERE
Predatory Lending Litigation: The lenders love federal court – dont forget the motion for REMAND to STATE COURT!
Here is the scenario……you file a predatory lending lawsuit alleging all sorts of causes of action. Here are a few of the typical causes of action you might raise in a predatory lending lawsuit:
- Fraud
- Misrepresentation
- Deceit
- Elder Abuse
- Truth in Lending Violation (Rescission, etc.)
- RESPA
- Civil Conspiracy
- Breach of contract
- Unjust enrichment
- etc.
You are all reved up because you just filed a lawsuit against the lender, and maybe even te loan servicer (sometimes people sue the loan servicer by accident because they are think, or are lead to believe the servicer owns the loan). Anyway, that is another story. So you file the lawsuit, and then a few weeks later you get notice that the DEFENDANTS ARESEEKING TO REMOVE THE CaSE FROM STATE COURT TO FEDERAL COURT.
I recently had this happen in a trial plan fraud / breach of contract case. Now, there are two ways to get to federal court:
(1) One of your causes of action raises a “federal question” (ex. the TILA and RESPA claim in the above example wouldraise federal questions) and;
(2) There is “diversity of citizenship” among the defendants (meaning essentially you and each of the defendants are from different states), AND the lawsuit must be seeking more than $75,000 in damages.
Now there are alot of little nuances to these two requirements, but suffice to say meeting either test will allow them to remove your case to federal courts. Federal courts, at least in my opinion, are harder to win in for homeowners based on the research I have done in other cases. To me, federal court is where “predatory lending claims go to die.” Now this is just one mans opinion, based on alot fo the cases I have read.
Anyway, in this case I informed the other attorney that there were no grounds to take the case to federal court, but that did not stop them. I immediately filed a motion for remand and cited extensively the cases supporting my position. At the end of the day, we won, and the case was remanded back to federal court where it should have been in the first place. There are some things you can do to make it less likely that they lender will remove the case, but that is why you might want to hire a lawyer rather than go in pro per.
At any rate, the lesson here is to be careful what claims you are bringing in your predatory lending lawsuit. Federal claims will probably land you in federal court where the costs might be higher, the procedural rules may trip you, etc. Do not let the lenders have thier way.

