<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAN A CALIFORNIA HOMEOWNER DEMAND THAT THE LENDER OR LOAN SERVICER PRODUCE THE NOTE AS A FORECLOSURE DEFENSE STRATEGY?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/</link>
	<description>The Information You Need To Save Your Home From Foreclosure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-8342</link>
		<dc:creator>Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-8342</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your general comments on predatory lending.  We know many of these things to be true.  How to best leverage the violations is the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your general comments on predatory lending.  We know many of these things to be true.  How to best leverage the violations is the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Zander</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-7391</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Zander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-7391</guid>
		<description>Forensic Documents Research - 760) 244-6248
Worked at Pioneer Title through the 80&#039;s
Attended the American School of Mortgage Banking
Certified by local college for loan origination
Escrow II     /Past Notary and Loan Signing Specialist for Notary(did not renew 2009).
Just finished the BSOL-Program at Azusa Pacific University
Owner of Zander Construction/30 years
Pamela Zander says:
If you had a table funded loan, which means the funding source came from the collection of approx. 10 million loans to combine a &quot;pooling apreement,&quot; that source did not fund the loan, you did!  The OCC examines national banks to ensure their safe and sound financial condition and ensures compliance with applicable banking laws, rules and regulation.  The CAG (Customer Assistant Group), was established to assist customers who have questions or complaints involving national banks.  Same thing applies to Federal Banks.

If the bank failed to address any of your issues and/or concerns or you disagree wih their response, contact the CAG in writing within 30 days of receipt of the banks letter.  I too, have become a victim of &quot;predatory lending practices,&quot; because the wolves have found an escape, by which to scam the entire country.  Who&#039;s to blame?  When the Clinton Administration revisited the Glass Steigal Act/1933 and the Community Reinvestment Act/1977; Clinton lowered the hammer on the banks  to force their involvement to include low income to moderate income earner&#039;s the advancement of creative financing to own a home.  The problem is that it created that web of finance that caught even the most careful business person in the trap.  We have just  experienced the maturity of the three year ARM&#039;s; wait until the five year ARM&quot;S hit.  Oh my socks!  This will hit in approx. 2012 and will set the USA spinning in the worst depression one has ever seen.  These subprime loans, qualified consumers for the first part of the loan, but not when the adjustable rate interest &quot;kicked in.&quot;

Fight! Fight! Even if you have to take the defunct &quot;pretender lender&quot; to court.  Chances are, it is not the original/bank, a so-called lender from the table funded loan, as they are no longer in business.  In fact, if a bank such as Bank of America has your loan; they have become the servicer-not the owner of your loan. Write a &quot;written qualified request.&quot;  Ask for the Corporate Transfer, the (Assignment of the Deed of Trust and the Assignment of Trustee), which is validated by the Notary Seal and Signatory and ask where it was recorded.  You will find the original Trustee on the face of the Deed of Trust.  If this does not occur, then ASAP, send the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve, a signed letter in a heading called REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY for NOTICE TO CANCEL - using a Notary Signatory form.  Your bank will usually do the Notary for free.  Also send one to the Bank/Servicer.  Record it in the County Recorder&#039;s Office, where your home is located.  This may cause a title waive, but it can be used as a good defense for your case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forensic Documents Research &#8211; 760) 244-6248<br />
Worked at Pioneer Title through the 80&#8242;s<br />
Attended the American School of Mortgage Banking<br />
Certified by local college for loan origination<br />
Escrow II     /Past Notary and Loan Signing Specialist for Notary(did not renew 2009).<br />
Just finished the BSOL-Program at Azusa Pacific University<br />
Owner of Zander Construction/30 years<br />
Pamela Zander says:<br />
If you had a table funded loan, which means the funding source came from the collection of approx. 10 million loans to combine a &#8220;pooling apreement,&#8221; that source did not fund the loan, you did!  The OCC examines national banks to ensure their safe and sound financial condition and ensures compliance with applicable banking laws, rules and regulation.  The CAG (Customer Assistant Group), was established to assist customers who have questions or complaints involving national banks.  Same thing applies to Federal Banks.</p>
<p>If the bank failed to address any of your issues and/or concerns or you disagree wih their response, contact the CAG in writing within 30 days of receipt of the banks letter.  I too, have become a victim of &#8220;predatory lending practices,&#8221; because the wolves have found an escape, by which to scam the entire country.  Who&#8217;s to blame?  When the Clinton Administration revisited the Glass Steigal Act/1933 and the Community Reinvestment Act/1977; Clinton lowered the hammer on the banks  to force their involvement to include low income to moderate income earner&#8217;s the advancement of creative financing to own a home.  The problem is that it created that web of finance that caught even the most careful business person in the trap.  We have just  experienced the maturity of the three year ARM&#8217;s; wait until the five year ARM&#8221;S hit.  Oh my socks!  This will hit in approx. 2012 and will set the USA spinning in the worst depression one has ever seen.  These subprime loans, qualified consumers for the first part of the loan, but not when the adjustable rate interest &#8220;kicked in.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fight! Fight! Even if you have to take the defunct &#8220;pretender lender&#8221; to court.  Chances are, it is not the original/bank, a so-called lender from the table funded loan, as they are no longer in business.  In fact, if a bank such as Bank of America has your loan; they have become the servicer-not the owner of your loan. Write a &#8220;written qualified request.&#8221;  Ask for the Corporate Transfer, the (Assignment of the Deed of Trust and the Assignment of Trustee), which is validated by the Notary Seal and Signatory and ask where it was recorded.  You will find the original Trustee on the face of the Deed of Trust.  If this does not occur, then ASAP, send the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve, a signed letter in a heading called REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY for NOTICE TO CANCEL &#8211; using a Notary Signatory form.  Your bank will usually do the Notary for free.  Also send one to the Bank/Servicer.  Record it in the County Recorder&#8217;s Office, where your home is located.  This may cause a title waive, but it can be used as a good defense for your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nora</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-4745</link>
		<dc:creator>Nora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-4745</guid>
		<description>Under what would be called a normal situation, when then banks and lenders and or servicers were legitimately foreclosing on homes I can understand a judge saying in a non-judicial foreclosure that that legitimate entity does not have to produce the NOTE, however, in today&#039;s circumstances where banks, lenders, and servicers are fraudulently fabricating documentation in order to foreclose, they should and must be forced to produce the NOTE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under what would be called a normal situation, when then banks and lenders and or servicers were legitimately foreclosing on homes I can understand a judge saying in a non-judicial foreclosure that that legitimate entity does not have to produce the NOTE, however, in today&#8217;s circumstances where banks, lenders, and servicers are fraudulently fabricating documentation in order to foreclose, they should and must be forced to produce the NOTE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Vondran PRODUCE THE NOTE AS A FORECLOSURE DEFENSE STRATEGY? &#171; Timothymccandless&#039;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Vondran PRODUCE THE NOTE AS A FORECLOSURE DEFENSE STRATEGY? &#171; Timothymccandless&#039;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-4744</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran on March 6, 2010 · 26 Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran on March 6, 2010 · 26 Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-4008</link>
		<dc:creator>Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-4008</guid>
		<description>We cannot give legal advice over the internet.  If you have a foreclosure or bankruptcy question, please contact us.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We cannot give legal advice over the internet.  If you have a foreclosure or bankruptcy question, please contact us.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cleopatra</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-3993</link>
		<dc:creator>cleopatra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 23:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-3993</guid>
		<description>November 2006 I applied a mortgage loan to wachovia. From Nov 2006 to July, 2007 My mortgage loan was with other bank.  July,2007, Wachovia offered me the home loan which I accept.  The paper work of Nov. 2006 was &quot;piggy back&quot; to July 2007 mortgage but nerver issued a deed of trust. In 2008, I defaulted my payments for six months. I was told over the phone that my house will be in forclosure if I dont update my payments.  I borrowed money and keep my loan up to date.  At this point Wells, I communicate with wells fargo , no longer wachovia.  I was granted loan modification with graduating increase of interest in 5 years.  Just recently, May, 2011 i received a notice that my loan was fully transfered from Wachovia to Wells Fargo.  

My question is If I dont have deed of trust, can Wells fargo produce one for me? Can Wells fargo foreclose my house if I defaulted? Does Wells fargo have the legal right on my property because the note was transfered by Wachovia to wells fargo knowing that wachovia doesnt have the authority to do mortgage business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November 2006 I applied a mortgage loan to wachovia. From Nov 2006 to July, 2007 My mortgage loan was with other bank.  July,2007, Wachovia offered me the home loan which I accept.  The paper work of Nov. 2006 was &#8220;piggy back&#8221; to July 2007 mortgage but nerver issued a deed of trust. In 2008, I defaulted my payments for six months. I was told over the phone that my house will be in forclosure if I dont update my payments.  I borrowed money and keep my loan up to date.  At this point Wells, I communicate with wells fargo , no longer wachovia.  I was granted loan modification with graduating increase of interest in 5 years.  Just recently, May, 2011 i received a notice that my loan was fully transfered from Wachovia to Wells Fargo.  </p>
<p>My question is If I dont have deed of trust, can Wells fargo produce one for me? Can Wells fargo foreclose my house if I defaulted? Does Wells fargo have the legal right on my property because the note was transfered by Wachovia to wells fargo knowing that wachovia doesnt have the authority to do mortgage business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comments.  In Arizona and California the &quot;security follows the note.&quot;  This is one of the trick legal doctrines they get to use.  Of course, that assumes they have the note which is the big joke in the first place.  I suspect judges do not want to ask for the note because at the end of the day they would, and we would find out, the entire banking system is based on loans the financials institutions cannot prove they actually own, and there is no unbroken chain of endorsed notes from your loan originator up to the securitized loan trust that claims your loan is in there.  Pretty amazing really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comments.  In Arizona and California the &#8220;security follows the note.&#8221;  This is one of the trick legal doctrines they get to use.  Of course, that assumes they have the note which is the big joke in the first place.  I suspect judges do not want to ask for the note because at the end of the day they would, and we would find out, the entire banking system is based on loans the financials institutions cannot prove they actually own, and there is no unbroken chain of endorsed notes from your loan originator up to the securitized loan trust that claims your loan is in there.  Pretty amazing really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Pyles</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Pyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 05:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-2292</guid>
		<description>This ruling seems to defy common sense.  If the someone holding a deed of trust can foreclose without also holding (and therefore being able to produce) the note ... and if the note has been conveyed independently of the deed of trust to another party ... then that party can *also* demand payment on the note (albeit now unsecured by the deed of trust).  This seems to open up the homeowner, now bereft of home, to being abused not once, but twice.  How can this possibly be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ruling seems to defy common sense.  If the someone holding a deed of trust can foreclose without also holding (and therefore being able to produce) the note &#8230; and if the note has been conveyed independently of the deed of trust to another party &#8230; then that party can *also* demand payment on the note (albeit now unsecured by the deed of trust).  This seems to open up the homeowner, now bereft of home, to being abused not once, but twice.  How can this possibly be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>Foreclosure Defense Attorney Steve Vondran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 10:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>NOT SURE IF I COULD HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF.  YES, IT IS AMAZING WHAT THE BIG BANKS ARE GETTING AWAY WITH JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE IN DEFAULT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOT SURE IF I COULD HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF.  YES, IT IS AMAZING WHAT THE BIG BANKS ARE GETTING AWAY WITH JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE IN DEFAULT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANONYMOUS</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/2010/03/can-a-california-homeowner-demand-that-the-lender-or-loan-servicer-produce-the-note-as-a-foreclosure-defense-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>ANONYMOUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foreclosuredefenseresourcecenter.com/?p=436#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>California Commercial Code 3301. a note may only be enforced if one has actual possession of the note as a holder, or has possession as a non-holder with holder rights. 

That means not only must they have the note but it also must have proper endorsement.

POSSESSION and ENDORSEMENT  

only if the purchase and sale agreement was valid would it meet possession requirements under [3-301(a)and(b)] and to be considered a HOLDER by reason of [CC 1-202(b)21] would not qualify under [CC 3-301(a)] without endorsement.

quote: ONLY when the underlying enforceability issues of the PROMISSORY NOTE are ESTABLISHED can an entity then look to any DEED of TRUST which is only an accessory SECURITY INTEREST which then gives rise to a foreclosure right.

Assignment of the Deed of Trust does not give right to automatically foreclose and it is impossible to trigger 2924 without a note or if the note was obtained after a recorded notice of sale.

The Deed of Trust is only incident to the underlying Promissory Note and is legally null without it. Therefore it is impossible and absurd to legally foreclose on real property without the note. 

Judicial or non-judicial, California or Connecticut, to simply record a false notice of default and notice of sale is fraud and grand theft is a felony by law. And any person(s) with authority sworn by oath to uphold law that turns a blind eye or simply ignores it is guilty in aiding and abetting such crimes and should be equally punished. 

For the people by the people!...  not, for the banks and against the people! and if our court system continues to allow banks and politicians to be break the same laws we are upheld to and leaving the people helpless without recourse or remedy then what further the purpose of our courts and laws?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California Commercial Code 3301. a note may only be enforced if one has actual possession of the note as a holder, or has possession as a non-holder with holder rights. </p>
<p>That means not only must they have the note but it also must have proper endorsement.</p>
<p>POSSESSION and ENDORSEMENT  </p>
<p>only if the purchase and sale agreement was valid would it meet possession requirements under [3-301(a)and(b)] and to be considered a HOLDER by reason of [CC 1-202(b)21] would not qualify under [CC 3-301(a)] without endorsement.</p>
<p>quote: ONLY when the underlying enforceability issues of the PROMISSORY NOTE are ESTABLISHED can an entity then look to any DEED of TRUST which is only an accessory SECURITY INTEREST which then gives rise to a foreclosure right.</p>
<p>Assignment of the Deed of Trust does not give right to automatically foreclose and it is impossible to trigger 2924 without a note or if the note was obtained after a recorded notice of sale.</p>
<p>The Deed of Trust is only incident to the underlying Promissory Note and is legally null without it. Therefore it is impossible and absurd to legally foreclose on real property without the note. </p>
<p>Judicial or non-judicial, California or Connecticut, to simply record a false notice of default and notice of sale is fraud and grand theft is a felony by law. And any person(s) with authority sworn by oath to uphold law that turns a blind eye or simply ignores it is guilty in aiding and abetting such crimes and should be equally punished. </p>
<p>For the people by the people!&#8230;  not, for the banks and against the people! and if our court system continues to allow banks and politicians to be break the same laws we are upheld to and leaving the people helpless without recourse or remedy then what further the purpose of our courts and laws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

